<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[M5stickc microphone more sensitive (better) than M5stickcplus?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi all, I tried this sample using both M5stickc and M5stickcplus devices. : <a href="https://m5stack.hackster.io/yutakau/hand-washing-timer-with-water-sound-detector-fa442d" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Hand washing timer with water sound detector</a>. Both devices work fine. But noticed that the M5stickc is much more superior in terms of microphone sensitivity. Same exact code. Only changed include files: #include &lt;M5StickC.h&gt; or #include &lt;M5StickCPlus.h&gt;.  Take a look at the graphs of sensitivity (predictions) from both the devices in the same exact place/environment. Disappointed since M5Stickc is in a EOL status :(. If anyone has any thoughts please share. Thanks.<br />
<img src="/assets/uploads/files/1644107751091-sensitivity-m5stickc-resized.jpg" alt="0_1644107746410_Sensitivity-M5StickC.jpg" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
<p dir="auto"><img src="/assets/uploads/files/1644107772965-sensitivity-m5stickc-plus-resized.jpg" alt="0_1644107770569_Sensitivity-M5StickC-Plus.jpg" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://community.m5stack.com/topic/4006/m5stickc-microphone-more-sensitive-better-than-m5stickcplus</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:46:06 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.m5stack.com/topic/4006.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2022 00:38:52 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>