<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[ATOM vs Core with respect to network activation and MQTT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I have been developing using Micropython on Atoms (in USB Mode , using the M5Stack plugin for Visual Editor (mac). I set up a module as the equivalent of a print command that publishes the printed text to a log subscriber using MQTT. I found that I did not have to initialize the network since my router SSID and password are installed when you burn and configure using M5Burner. I think this is great because  it does not expose my network information in my .py scripts.<br />
However I just started using a Core (Panda) development unit. I set it up the same way but when I try to run the scripts in Visual Editor (in USB mode) the network is not enabled. (I get a 128 error in the MQTT publish). I really do not want to expose my network info and I have verified that the  network works when I set it to internet mode and run it on web UIflow (as does the MQTT script).<br />
Is there some way I can get the network started in USB mode (or APP mode for that matter) without activating  it in a .py script?</p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks in advance!!<br />
Rob</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.m5stack.com/topic/4267/atom-vs-core-with-respect-to-network-activation-and-mqtt</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 12:21:38 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.m5stack.com/topic/4267.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2022 03:47:47 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>