yes, I noticed that error too. Try adding an Init pahub_0 block manually.

See Project Zone example: M5Tough_PaHub_Multiple_Units_UIFlow2.0.5

Thanks
Felix

env4_0 = ENVUnit(i2c=PAHUBUnit(i2c=i2c0, channel=0 , address=0x71), type=4)

UIFlow2 also creates the same micropython line (just without the 0x71 address allocation), with the same error. In UiFlow 1 this is not a problem.

I have not yet been able to attempt this with other M5 cores. In your solution, which M5 core did you use?

I am wondering if there is not a different call for Core 2's

it just occurred to me; except for the 7th ENV IV unit you could get away with only one PaHub like this:

Core I2C Master --- PaHub
                     |
                    [0]- ENV IV - DLight - VMeter - CO2
                    [1]- ENV IV - DLight - VMeter - CO2
                    [2]- ENV IV - DLight - VMeter
                    [3]- ENV IV - DLight
                    [4]- ENV IV
                    [5]- ENV IV

Thanks
Felix

from the syntax I gather you are using UIFlow1 (and not UIFlow2), correct?

I already tried in the past to use a PaHub with non default I2C address in UIFlow1, but I wasn't successful. I don't think it is possible - but I could be wrong. In UIFlow2 I found a solution. Please see here.

Thanks
Felix

Measurements from several device types (ENV IV x 7 , CO2 x 2, Dlight x 4 , Voltmeter x3 etc ) are required. The ENV sensors on their own will need more than one PaHUB: so either a parallel, or nested approach is needed.

Either way (parallel or nested), I am unable to correctly add the sensors in UiFlow or in python. By default sensors are assigned to a PaHUB with address (0x70) via this python command (example an ENV 4 unit is added):

env4_0 = unit.get(unit.ENV4, unit.PAHUB0) ----------- [1]

"unit.PAHUB0" refers to channel 0 of the hub connected to port A that has an address of (0x70).

To add other PaHubs is easy (in this case the hub's address was altered via hardwiring to 0x71):

pahub_0 = unit.get(unit.PAHUB, unit.PORTA, 0x71) ----------- [2]

But it is unclear how to add sensors to such a hub. I am looking for the correct python syntax in line [1] to refer to a PaHUB that has an address other than (0x70).

ok, I see, thanks for posting the example.

How many of the sensors have a unique I2C address? All of those can be connected directly to the core (i2c master) in paralell. Only the sensors which share the same i2c address need to go behind a PaHub (unless there is a way to change the i2c address of those sensors). For instance like this:

Core I2C master ----|----------|----------|---~ ~----|
              PaHub(0x70)  S1(addr1)  S2(addr2)  S6(addr6)
                    |
                    | -- 1: S10 (addr10)
                    | -- 2: S10 (addr10)
                    ~
                    | -- 5: S10 (addr10)
                    | -- 6: S10 (addr10)

Thanks
Felix

Here is an example that mentions expansion to 36 I2C ports using 7 PAhubs:

https://www.bastelgarage.ch/m5stack-pa-hub-2-i2c-expansion-unit-1-to-6

"...For example, you can wire PaHUBs with the Root-PaHUB to get more places for your I2C slave devices. If you have seven of them, you can extend up to 36 I2C GROVE ports."

So, I gather this is a nesting using two levels: 1 "Root PaHUB" (6x channels) and 6 secondary hubs (each with 6 channels).

I anybody had success with this inside Uiflow or some other method, any advice will be appreciated.

(I have the need to log data from about 15 sensors, some that are of the same type)

are you sure the examples you found are talking about nested PaHubs?

Could it be that they mean connecting multiple PaHubs (with different I2C addresses) in parallel? E.g.

Core I2C master ----------|------------|------------|------------|----~
                    PaHub(0x70)  PaHub(0x71)  PaHub(0x72)  PaHub(0x73)

BTW: I don't think UIFlow supports nested PaHubs.

Thanks
Felix