<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Core2 v1.1 vs Fire 2.7]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">What is the differences between the Fire 2.7 and the Core2 v1.1 controllers?  Both seem to have 8MB PSRAM and similar features - the Fire appears to have 3 physical buttons while the Core2 v1.1 uses the touchscreen.  Both seem to use the same base and battery.</p>
<p dir="auto">Why would you buy one over the other?</p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks!</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.m5stack.com/topic/6835/core2-v1-1-vs-fire-2-7</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 08:15:31 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.m5stack.com/topic/6835.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 21:04:01 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Core2 v1.1 vs Fire 2.7 on Wed, 02 Oct 2024 21:31:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Couldn't decide, so I bought both lol.</p>
<p dir="auto">Each seems to have some different strengths - the Fire has more ports, the cool magnetic base and physical buttons that often work better than touchscreens.  As such it's great for tinkering.  But the Core 2 seems a bit more 'polished' for portable applications.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.m5stack.com/post/26588</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.m5stack.com/post/26588</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[TomKatt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2024 21:31:17 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>