<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[M5stickC Plus2 Enhancement Request]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Please design a new device “M5stickC Plus3” that contains BMI270/BMM150/BMP280 inside and no magnet. The external IMUPro has those sensors, which are far more advanced than the internal IMU in the Plus2, but it does not work unless connected with the Plus2 via a long cable, due to the magnet on the back of the M5stickC Plus2. An integrated design would be much better.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.m5stack.com/topic/7617/m5stickc-plus2-enhancement-request</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 06:42:13 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.m5stack.com/topic/7617.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2025 05:52:33 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to M5stickC Plus2 Enhancement Request on Wed, 18 Jun 2025 00:11:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/pmolsen" aria-label="Profile: pmolsen">@<bdi>pmolsen</bdi></a> Agreed, having those sensors built-in without the magnet would make things a lot easier. It would remove the need for external modules and avoid interference issues. A Plus3 with that setup sounds like a good improvement.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.m5stack.com/post/29267</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.m5stack.com/post/29267</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Slarck]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2025 00:11:11 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>