First I really enjoy the M5Stack products so much that I plan to use them in the 2025/26 school year as part two new electronics classes...I think?

Simply put is that my problems are the result of not knowing the M5Stack products well enough yet. Yet part of my issues are the result of:

• M5Stack AI Engine (and other AI Engines) simply making stuff up
• Lack of documents with an explanation of blocks (which isn't a problem with Arduinos)
• Simply put some stuff should "just work"

So my question is...because my students will ask...trust me....why can't we simply:

• adjust the SCL and SDA so they align with UIFLOW2?
• why not add the address of the device with the SCL and SDA in UIFLOW2?

I am guessing these requests will cause a lot of code to be rewrote? Yet to make UIFLOW2 more flexible and to reduce frustration these requests would go a long way when you consider I wasted over 2 hours on a Friday night of trying to figure out why I couldn't connect a ENV III Sensor to work through a PaHub (now I know...address conflict) which was even more complicated when I was using PortC!

Thanks to a few of you (Felix) for this magic line of code and I just discovered how to add my own code today with Green item "Add mpy code" under SYSTEM (so the weekend wasn't a total loss) :

extio2_0 = EXTIO2Unit(PAHUBUnit(i2c=i2c0, channel=0, address=0x77)) # For EXTI/0 2

Sorry for my rant but I want to see M5Stack gain more of a market share!

Thanks-Brian

PS: I will visit the ENVIII later...it was more just a proof of concept vs. needing something to work.